Sunday, September 8, 2019
Ethernet for Automotive
Wikipedia: Ethernet over twisted pair
IEEE:
IEEE P802.3bp 1000BASE-T1 PHY Task Force
IEEE P802.3bw 100BASE-T1 Task Force
IEEE P802.3cg 10 Mb/s Single Pair Ethernet Task Force
Tuesday, August 27, 2019
Digital Design Verification Subsystem Lessons Learned
- make bus randomized during invalid cycle, to catch dut bugs that did not check valid signals. However, the constraint should still give 0 bus value a weight, so that 0 bus value can happen in invalid cycle, just in case that in real chip, the bus value is gated to 0 by upper layer module.
- bugs of features that cross two subsystems are difficult to catch. if a value generated in one module, and will be used in next module, it has a higher chance to have bug uncatched, as it needs correct model behavior as real hardware. solution: a) it's better to try to implement this in the same module, instead of split it into different modules, if possible. an example is the idle insertion/deletion to accommodate the AM (alignment marker) insertion/deletion in PCS. in this case, it's better to implement it in PCS instead of in MAC.
- bugs of features that related to performance AND cross two subsystems are extremely difficult to catch. possible solutions: a) in subsystem level, force to speed up counter value count, and increase pkt counts and so on, so that the possibility is increased. however, this needs very specific test scenarios; b) use hardware acceleration or e, e.g. Palladium or Synopsys ZeBu; c) chip top test to simulate the cross subsystem behaviors
- simplify architecture based on real application. sometimes, smart design means simple brutal force. this one needs the architects sensitivity to the industry use scenarios. I have two examples: a) initially we design our switch to have all kinds of protocols and features to both be legacy device compatible and also includes new features. this leads to overdesign and many bugs (insufficient man power and verification time). however, data center ethernet switch are more focused on feed and speed, it needs high throughput, less focused on protocols. end results, a lot of features are not used, a lot of hot new architectures (like SDN) are not used. this is big waste of resources. b) ...?
- Review every registers with DE in review meetings. Need to decide for every register: a) what is its meaning and actual use case (e.g. how does software guy config it, how does SA test it in real chip); b) can it be randomized in base test or should be tested in specific test; c) does it have some values that are often used by SA and Customer in real chip? weighted distribution?
- Review base config randomization constraints for base test. this is also related to 5) as some of the configs are registers. it needs designer and SA's input to confirm.
- simulation time vs packets number: Do Not trade packets number for simulation time. Meaning that do not try to save hardware resources. For verification, the first priority is function correctness, and the more packet number, the more possible that a bug will be hit. CPU resources are cheap, real chip bugs are expensive!
- random noise register/memory access during every test. But make sure that the noise and actually traffic can actually hit the same register/memory to trigger corner bugs.
- there should be 2 types of checker for a features if it cannot be accurately checked in every scenarios: a) a specific test that accurately check it's function; b) a general checker which is enabled in every testcase, and act as a sanity checker, in case there is some fundamental bugs in certain corner cases, which was not found in the a).
- choose the constraint range carefully, and choose the random value carefully. speed mode, pkt number, and the event happen time are all related, need to consider them when setting constraint or randomization range.
- have status and counters for monitors and controlling tb in cfg or virtual interface. for example, have counter count received pkt count, or have status variable to monitor dut is in transmiting or idle state, and so on.
Tuesday, August 20, 2019
Protocols
– Bus topology / routing / resources:
From this point of view, I²C is a clear winner over SPI in sparing pins, board routing and how easy it is to build an I²C network.
– Throughput / Speed:
If data must be transferred at ‘high speed’, SPI is clearly the protocol of choice, over I²C. SPI is full-duplex; I²C is not. SPI does not define any speed limit; implementations often go over 10 Mbps. I²C is limited to 1Mbps in Fast Mode+ and to 3.4 Mbps in High Speed Mode – this last one requiring specific I/O buffers, not always easily available.
– Elegance:
Both SPI and I2C offer good support for communication with low-speed devices, but SPI is better suited to applications in which devices transfer data streams, while I²C is better at multi master ‘register access’ application.
Conclusions.
In the world of communication protocols, I²C and SPI are often considered as ‘little’ communication protocols compared to Ethernet, USB, SATA, PCI-Express and others, that present throughput in the x100 megabit per second range if not gigabit per second. Though, one must not forget what each protocol is meant for. Ethernet, USB, SATA are meant for ‘outside the box communications’ and data exchanges between whole systems. When there is a need to implement a communication between integrated circuit such as a microcontroller and a set of relatively slow peripheral, there is no point at using any excessively complex protocols. There, I²C and SPI perfectly fit the bill and have become so popular that it is very likely that any embedded system engineer will use them during his/her career.
2. RTC (Real-Time Clock)3. UART(Universal Asynchronous Receiver/Transmitter)
freebsd Serial and UART Tutorial
The Start bit always has a value of 0 (a Space). The Stop Bit always has a value of 1 (a Mark). This means that there will always be a Mark (1) to Space (0) transition on the line at the start of every word, even when multiple word are transmitted back to back. This guarantees that sender and receiver can resynchronize their clocks regardless of the content of the data bits that are being transmitted. refer to stm32f103 reference manual S.27.3.3: 16X oversampling was used to detect noise errors.
4. ARM AMBA
Burst len, size, type:
Out of order:
Interleave:
Unaligned Address:
AXI response
MIB RFC:
RFC2819 : Remote Network Monitoring Management Information Base
RFC2863: The Interfaces Group MIB
RFC3273: Remote Network Monitoring Management Information Base for High
RFC4836: Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3 Medium Attachment Units (MAUs)
RFC3635: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Ethernet-like Interface Types
PFC MIB counter
Networking Protocols:
1. What is the exact difference between SGMII and 1000Base-X?
Tuesday, July 23, 2019
Perl Notes
system()
Using the Perl system() functionThe system() function returns two numeric values folded into one. The first is the Unix signal (e.g INT=2, QUIT=3, KILL=9), if any, that terminated the command. This is stored in the lower eight bits returned. The next higher eight bits contain the exit code for the command you executed.
The result is a compound numeric value, not a logical value. This also reads inverted and is confusing. If you need more information on error, then you can break up the return code:
String
Monday, July 15, 2019
UVM Notes
UVM simulator steps
- VCS(Synopsys)
- IUS(Cadence)
- Questa(Mentor)
UVM Directory Structure
UVM_ROOT UVM_TOP
- long time confusion solved: the run_test() called in top tb module is defined in uvm_globals.svh which actually calls the run_test() in uvm_root.
- uvm_test_top is not a variable in uvm_root, how can you access that with uvm_root?
- class uvm_root extends uvm_component
- const uvm_root uvm_top = uvm_root::get();
- uvm_top is the top-level component, and any component whose parent is specified as NULL becomes a child of uvm_top.
- uvm top manages the phasing for all components.
- set globally the report verbosity, log files, and actions(?).
- Because uvm_top is globally accessible (in uvm_pkg scope(?)), UVM's reporting mechanism is accessible from anywhere outside uvm_component, such as in modules and sequences.
UVM Configuration
1) uvm_config_db- uvm_config_db#(int)::set(this, "env.agent", "is_active", UVM_PASSIVE);
- uvm_config_db#(int)::set(null, "uvm_test_top.env.agent", "is_active", UVM_PASSIVE);
- uvm_config_db#(int)::set(uvm_root::get(), "uvm_test_top.env.agent", "is_active", UVM_PASSIVE);//equivalent to using null
- uvm_config_db#(int)::set(null, "*.env.agent", "is_active", UVM_PASSIVE);
- uvm_config_db#(int)::set(null, "uvm_test_top.env*", "is_active", UVM_PASSIVE);
- Database must be type parameterized. this allows config db to be created for any standard or user-defined type; and allows better compile time checking.
- Methods are static
- Methods use a specific contxt argument, whi is usually this; unless the set is called from the top module, in which case it must be assigned to null
- syntax: static function void set(uvm_component cntxt, string inst_name, string field_name, ref T value)
- syntax: static function void get(uvm_component cntxt, string inst_name, string field_name, ref T value)
- get is only required when set is called from the top level module or outside the build phase
- syntax: static function bit exists(uvm_component cntxt, string inst_name, string field_name, bit spell_chk = 0)
- syntax: static task wait_modified(uvm_component cntxt, string inst_name, string field_name)
- inst_name may contain wildcards or regular expression syntax
- for object, interfaces or user-defined types, use uvc_config_db
- for run-time configuration, use uvc_config_db
2) a specialized cfg task is set_config_* for uvm_component class, where * can be int, string or object, depending on type of config property:
- config settings are automatically resolved in UVM build phase; that is because apply_config_settings() is executed in the build phase (when super.build_phase() is called in any uvm_component class). settings are applied only when match is found, if not found, field names will be unset, and mismatched configuration set's should be listed at end of simulation.
- syntax: virtual function void set_config_in (string inst_name, string field, bitstream_t value)
- inst_name is relative pathname to a specific component instance from the component where the method is called
- field is a string containing a config property name of the instance class
- set build options before calling super.build_phase; this is also why the parameters are strings, because the components and fields does not exist yet.
- set_config_int("env.agent", "is_active", UVM_PASSIVE);
- set_config_int("*", "recording_detail", 1);//default is 0, by enabling the recording details for every component, transactions can be viewed in the waveform window(?)
- the creation of the agent instance in the parent build_phase() triggers the execution of the build_phase() of the agent instance.
- config property must be automated in the component where declared (field registered)
- Config settings in higher scope take precedence over lower scopes.
- Config settings in the same scope conform to "last one in wins"
UVM Field Automation
#Non-array1) `uvm_field_int (<field_name>, <flags>)
2) `uvm_field_object (<field_name>, <flags>)
3) `uvm_field_string (<field_name>, <flags>)
4) `uvm_field_event (<field_name>, <flags>)
#static Array:
1) `uvm_field_sarray_enum (<enum_type>, <field_name>, <flags>)
2) `uvm_field_sarray_int (<field_name>, <flags>)
3) `uvm_field_sarray_object (<field_name>, <flags>)
4) `uvm_field_sarray_string (<field_name>, <flags>)
#dynamic Array:
1) `uvm_field_array_enum (<enum_type>, <field_name>, <flags>)
2) `uvm_field_array_int (<field_name>, <flags>)
3) `uvm_field_array_object (<field_name>, <flags>)
4) `uvm_field_array_string (<field_name>, <flags>)
#dynamic Array:
1) `uvm_field_queue_enum (<enum_type>, <field_name>, <flags>)
2) `uvm_field_queue_int (<field_name>, <flags>)
3) `uvm_field_queue_object (<field_name>, <flags>)
4) `uvm_field_queue_string (<field_name>, <flags>)
#associative Array:
1) `uvm_field_aa_<d_type>_<ix_type>
uvm_factory
UVM Phasing
UVM_sequence
UVM_POOL
Scoreboard
A scoreboard normally consists of 3 components of functions:Scoreboard internals:
update counter, tracking received, dropped, matched, and mismatched
report_phase, print summary of statistics
end of simulation: check scoreboard queues are empty
Scoreboard must create a new copy of received data item by cloning, before writing the cloned packet to the queue.
UVM TLM Communication bwtween Components
Data Flow: producer create data, consumer consume data
Producer ---data---> Cosumer
Control Flow: Initiator sends request to Target
Initiator ---request---> Target
producer is initiator: write operation, also called push/put: e.g. analysis connections
producer is target: read operation, also called pull/get
Port: TLM connection object for Initiator
Imp (implementation): TLM connection object for target.
Export:
symbols: square(port), circle(imp), triangle(export)
port.connect(Imp)
port.connect(Export)
TLM Analysis Interface
uvm_analysis_port #(data type) ap_out
ap_out = new("ap_out", this);
`uvm_analysis_imp_decl(_foo)
uvm_analysis_imp_foo #(data type) foo_in
`uvm_analysis_imp_decl(_bar)
uvm_analysis_imp_foo #(data type) bar_in
function void write_foo(input ---);
endfunction
function void write_bar(input---);
endfunction
...ap_out.connect(...ap_in)
Complex Module UVC connection(external to intermal)
two ways:
1. Module monitor: all external connections are made to this monitor and monitor is responsible for routing connections to other component in the UVC.
the good: Single, central location for connecting external TLM interfaces.
the bad: at the expense of additional internal interface connections to other components.
2. Module connections: external TLM interfaces are placed on UVC itself, then routed using hierarchical connections and not separate TLM interface. use of TLM export object
the good: fewer TLM connections
the bad: losing some readability
Port initiators can be connected to port, export, or imp targets.
Export initiators can be connected to export or imp targets.
Imp cannot be a connection initiator. Imp is a target only, and is always the last connections object on a route.
TLM FIFO
Analysis FIFO
uvm_tlm_analysis_fifo is a specialization of uvm_tlm_fifo:
unbounded (size=0)
analysis_export replaces put export, support analysis write method.
uvm_analysis_port ---> analysis_export---analysis_fifo---get_peek_export <---scoreboard_get_port
uvm_tlm_analysis_fifo #(data type) tb_fifo = new("...", this);
uvm_get_port $(data type) sb_in = new("...", this);
function void connect_phase();
sb_in.connect(tb_fifo.get_peek_export)
endfunction
by the way, analysis fifo's blocking_get_export is just an alias to get_peek_export
Wednesday, July 10, 2019
Ethernet Protocol Notes
this post is about 1G Physical Coding Sublayer (PCS), and explains scrambler/descrambler. Note the way it explains Bit Error Rate (BER).
Gigabit Ethernet 1000BASE-T
scrambling -> Spread Spectrum
Thursday, May 30, 2019
Digital Design and Computer Architecuture Study Notes
Bottome-up progression:
Power Consumption:
Logic Gates:
Combinational Logic:
characterized by its propagation delay and contamination delay. The propagation delay, tpd, is the maximum time from when an input changes until the output or outputs reach their final value. The contamination delay, tcd, is the minimum time from when an input changes until any output starts to changes its value.Combinational logic has no cyclic paths and no races. If inputs are applied to combinational logic, the outputs will always settle to the correct value within a propagation delay.
-Building blocks: full adders, seven-segment display decoders, multiplexer, decoder, priority circuits, arithmetic circuits
-Boolean algebra
-Karnaugh maps: works well for problems with up to four variables. More importantly they give insight into manipulating Boolean equations. Gray code. Dont care for output can be treateed as either 0's or 1's at the designer's discretion.
-Glitches: insight from Karnaugh maps
Sequential Logic:
SR Latch:D Latch: copies D to Q when clk is 1
D flip-flop: copies D to Q on the rising edge of the clock, and remembers it's state at all other times
synchronous sequential circuit composition teaches us that a circuit is a synchronous sequential circuit if it consists of interconnected circuit elements such that:
-Every circuit element is either a register or a combinational circuit
-At least one circuit element is a register
-All registers receive the same clock signal
-Every cyclic path contains at least one register
-Building blocks: arithmetic circuits, counters, shift registers, memory arrays, and logic arrays.
Finite state machine:
-An FSM consists of two blocks of combinational logic, next state logic and output logic, and a register that stores the state.-There are two general classes of finite state machines: Moore machines (the outputs depend only on the current state of the machine), and Mealy machines (the outputs depend only on both the current state and the current inputs).
-HDL descriptions of state machines are correspondingly divided into three parts to model the state register, the next state logic, and the output logic.
Verilog Blocking and Nonblocking Assignement:
-Use always @ (posedge clk) and nonblocking assignments to model synchronous sequential logic.always @ (posedge clk)
begin
n1 <= d; //nonblocking
q <= n1; //nonblocking
end
-Use continous assignments to model simple combinational logic.
assign y = s ? d1 : d0;
-Use always @ (*) and blocking assignments to model more complicated combinational logic where the always statement is helpful
(A case statement implies combinational logic if all possible input combinations are defined; otherwise it implies sequential logic, because the output will keep its old value in the undefined cases.)
(If statement implies combinational logic, if all possible inputs combinations are handled; otherwise it produces sequential logic.)
(It is good practice to use blocking assignments for combinational logic and nonblocking assignments for sequential logic.)
(Signals in always statement and initial statement must be declared as reg type)
(Not that signal must be declared as reg because it appears on the left hand side of a <= or = sign in an always statement. Nevertheless, it does not mean it's the output of a register, and it can be the output of a combinational logic.)
always @ (*)
begin
p = a^ b; //blocking
g = a & b;//blocking
s = p ^ cin;
cout = g | (p & cin);
end
-Do not make assignments to the same signal in more than one always statement or continuous assignment
-assign statemns must be used outside always statements and are also evaluated concurrently. a type of continuous assignment.
-case statement and if statements must appear inside always statements.
Verilog
-Testbenches use the === and !=== operators for comparisons of equality and inequality respectively, because these operators work correctly with operands that could be x or z.
-Understand the following:
1) reg and wire (Berkeley CS150)
reg is a confusing term, it is used for anything that holds data. wire cannot retain any data, henceforth it must be driven by continuous assignments.
read 2) to understand what is state.
wire: continuous assignment only, can resolve multiple driver.
reg: a language failure, it's just a varialbe, nothing to do with register. can hold varaible, therefore procedural assignment. cannot be multiple driver. can model both combinational and sequential logic.
2) Inferred Latch (stackoverflow)3) blocking and non-blocking
4) a neat blinky
raspberry pi gpio controls
#gpiozero library https://gpiozero.readthedocs.io/en/stable/#


